How do you talk to an SJW forum

Super Smash Bros. Ultimate: Nintendo removes racist reference to Native Americans

Here you can find the corresponding comments - including a link to the news!

Moderators:Moderators, editors

Posts: 28111
Registered: 18.03.2009 12:51
Personal message:

Re: Super Smash Bros. Ultimate: Nintendo removes racist reference to Native Americans

Contribution from Wulgaru »

sabienchen wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:08 PM
Wulgaru wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:03 p.m. These currents are in power in the United States right now. In all institutions. Now to have a discourse against Sjws or the like is completely crazy.
So I thought the House of Representatives "switched" to MidTerms recently?
..and what institutions do you mean?
.. At the universities (in USA) "liberals are in power".

Most of the "mass media" (in the USA) are "in the hands of liberals" ... so again .. which institutions are you talking about specifically?
Do you really understand how the two-chamber system works in the USA if you think it has just been switched?

But good "liberal universities" and "liberal media" is FoxNews 101 or not even that is almost Nixon 101. I don't need a modern PC discussion for that. So get stuck. : wink:
Posts: 1968
Registered: 22.08.2010 02:30
User is blocked.
Personal message:

Re: Super Smash Bros. Ultimate: Nintendo removes racist reference to Native Americans

Contribution from Scaboos »

Wulgaru wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:03 p.m. Since you're already shooting words like meek and SJW-like arguments in my direction, this will probably be my last post in our little debate here.
Yes, if you already feel attacked by it (although you weren't addressed at all, actually) and therefore want to withdraw from the conversation, then that already says everything important. Not meant badly, just my observation / opinion.
Wulgaru wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:03 p.m. But I would like to say one more thing. What is relevant and what is not is indeed what matters. You have set out in great detail here why you consider things like the thread reason to be harmful. The question for me, however, is why do you want to explain the context for off-topic?
Unfortunately do not understand what you are referring to ...?
Wulgaru wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:03 p.m. As Kajetan quite rightly puts it, this meta outrage industry has formed and it now works independently of actual outrage, something like this is useful, but it doesn't need that fuel anymore. It's a reaction to what they call SJWs or something like Gamergate and the like (an extremely exaggerated one in my eyes).
Again, even if I have already written what feels like 100,000 times: The reason for terms like SJW and Gutmensch has been worked out by the respective people themselves. This is not a baseless insult that rights have invented as a fighting term. It simply expresses the knowledge and experience that you either REALLY want to stand up for the good and for justice and that you do so in a way that is simply for your own belly brushing and self-adulation. Or any other lower motives such as self-expression, sensational lust, etc.

That is why only someone can feel offended by SJW or do-gooder who actually feels caught out. Someone who is convinced that they are doing the right thing cannot be dissuaded from such a ridiculous accusation of being an SJW or a do-gooder. "Affected dogs bark.", Fits here perfectly.
Wulgaru wrote: ↑ 11/9/2018 4:03 p.m. On the other hand, an industry that has been specifically controlled for decades. Fox News is pursuing a long-term strategy and the current incarnation of the Republicans including the President are the preliminary interim results of it.
But right now I don't understand this convulsive focus on Fox News and USA and Co.

MfG Ska
Last changed by Skabus on 11/9/2018 4:24 PM, changed a total of 1 times.
Bye bye 4players. It was a great time!